For people who haven't been effected by grief, dealing with the pain, isolation, embarassment, regret, and devastation of a loss can be unfathomable.
I've been in situations where I found others' actions and words, especially in the workplace, to be almost cavalier about someone's experience of loss.
Think about this... case manager coming into work and hasn't had her morning coffee and is rushing to an 8 am meeting... Someone rushes by and says, "Hey, David died last night. . . took a turn for the worst and was dead before dawn. Oh, and Sue brought doughnuts in... their at Anita's desk."
This case manager had worked with David for 9 months, having weekly visits where, as he became sicker and sicker, opened his life and heart to her. She's supported him through doctor's visits, fighting insurance companies, and often sat down for a cup of coffee while coloring with his kids. She was present and engaged, wanting to know about David and his family's experiences. She was there during crying days and celebrating days.
Now, this case manager hasn't had time to put down her brief case and stands silently, not realizing that the coffee was scalding her hand. She's shocked awake and numbed at the same time.
When a death occurs in the workplace, the "facts" spread like wildfire in the undercurrents of office life, weaving in and out of cubicles. If their lucky, someone sends out a memo as soon as possible to get everyone on the same page or holds a meeting, giving space for people to react and be supported.
But sometimes management begrudgingly takes on the responsibility of informing everyone before speaking to the bereaved person.
In an ill-worded statement, everyone was told that "Ben's wife went in to premature labor and after hours, she miscarried." The news of the "blessed event", the upcoming anticipated birth, had already been publicized in a memo.
Another memo is sent out not too long after and it reads, "We are excited to hear that Ben and his wife Georgia are expecting their first child. The baby is due in about 6 months." To Ben and his wife, that first pregnancy was their first child; it was their unborn child.
The new baby is now considered high-risk. Stories fly around. Someone uncomfortably explains in a board report why Ben has been away from work for so long. It emphasized is that a second funeral had taken place four days ago, almost 14 months from the date the first baby was due, and it is unclear why Ben isn't back to work, placing undue burden on the rest of staff.
Sounds like fiction to some of you, I'm sure. Who could be so blaze about a client's death or an employees loss? It's harder to grasp that these events have occurred in two different organizations whose missions are to care compassionately for people at the end of life.
It seems rather mindless that staff can be compassionate to clients, deliver bad news professionally to families but not to or about a colleague. It seems ridiculous to think that an employee's loss can be trivialized or that an employee might actually care and be effected by the loss of a client.
We can easily take for granted that it's understood that someone might want to ask an employee what needs the family has after a loss or ask if an employee can take time away from a staffing to allow the reality of her client's death to sink in. We can exclaim to be the experts in the field and yet somehow that "expertise" gets lost when it is one of our own.
Can we truly help churches, businesses, and other medical professionals understand how to support bereft people when we can't support the person we park next to every day?
It might be worth a look to see if training needs to start where we live 8 hours a day before we go out and sell what we can't buy.